From Downton Abbey to Poldark, many popular period dramas are not always historically accurate – but does that really matter?
There are two kinds of period drama fans: those who are history enthusiasts wanting precise depictions of the past, and those drawn to the idealized versions of historical eras, perhaps imagining life in simpler times. Most of us fall somewhere in between. We can appreciate the historical inaccuracies while still enjoying the fantasy, like in Pride and Prejudice where Mr. Darcy rescues Elizabeth’s family from social ruin. Even Jane Austen herself wrote happy endings that weren’t necessarily realistic.
This brings up an important question. Should period drama fans demand total historical accuracy, or is it more about enjoying entertaining stories while also getting a glimpse of history? I believe it’s the latter.
If filmmakers aimed for 100% accuracy (which might not even be achievable), would we find the results engaging? Even critically acclaimed historical films like Schindler’s List took creative liberties.
A film or show follows a script and a formula, ultimately reflecting the filmmaker’s interpretation of history in a way that resonates with contemporary audiences.
Take Downton Abbey, for example. It became a cultural phenomenon not for its historical accuracy but for its compelling storytelling.
A historian from the University of New Hampshire, Nicoletta Gullace, studied the historical accuracies in Downton Abbey. She noted that life was harder and grittier in the early 1900s, but the show’s producers created a softer and more appealing experience for modern viewers.
The female characters in Downton Abbey exhibit various forms of feminism, from Sybil’s interest in women’s rights, to Mary’s sexual independence, to Edith’s career in journalism. Despite this, Gullace believes the show is enjoyable and compares watching it to visiting living museums or participating in historical reenactments.
Ultimately, period drama fans understand that most shows, like Poldark, aren’t entirely realistic. A middle ground may be ideal, where dramas respect the essence of the period while also incorporating modern filmmaking techniques. The 2004 adaptation of North & South, and Greta Gerwig’s recent version of Little Women, which respectfully tweaks the ending to honor Louisa May Alcott, are great examples of balancing historical accuracy with contemporary appeal.
It’s often the appearance of historical accuracy that we appreciate in period dramas.
There’s room for different styles of period dramas. Some people enjoy historical fantasies like Reign and Agent Carter, while others appreciate a blend of modern elements in shows like A Place to Call Home or Anne with an E. It depends on personal mood and preference.
Filmmakers should consider the intent of their period dramas and set appropriate expectations for viewers. For instance, we don’t expect historical accuracy from shows like Reign, so we can enjoy them as sensational historical fantasies. However, shows like Anne with an E should not present themselves as historically accurate when they include modernism, to avoid disappointing fans seeking historical fidelity.
As a period drama fan, I prioritize good storytelling. Whether a drama leans more towards historical accuracy, modernism, or fantasy, as long as it entertains me with a great story, I’m interested.
In the end, who would choose to watch romantic period dramas with historically accurate details like rotting teeth over an engaging experience like traveling back in time to meet your own Jamie Fraser in Outlander? It’s not a tough choice when you think about it.
What about you? Do you prefer more historical accuracy in period dramas, or are you okay with creative liberties? Join the discussion below in the comments!
