If you’re a big fan of Jane Austen, you’ve probably seen the 1995 movie adaptation of “Sense and Sensibility.” But if you’ve also read the book, you might have noticed some important differences between the two. Here are three major differences that, while subtle, have a significant impact on the story, offering you a fresh perspective on both versions.
1. Character Age Differences and Casting Choices
The filmmakers chose to tweak the ages of some characters, which turned out to be a smart move. This change allowed several talented actors to join the cast, although they might have been too old if the characters’ ages were kept as in the book.
In the novel, Col. Brandon is 35, but in the movie, he’s portrayed as older. Alan Rickman, who was 48 at the time, played Col. Brandon. Initially, some fans thought Brandon was too old and dull for Marianne. However, Rickman’s heartfelt and charming performance changed many minds, making the character’s romantic interest in Marianne more believable and endearing. This example shows how casting can significantly influence a character’s reception.
2. Edward Ferrars: From Moody to Charming
In the book, Edward Ferrars visits Barton Cottage much sooner, and he’s quite moody, silent, and short-tempered during his stay. This made it hard for readers to sympathize with him, as he had plenty of opportunities to tell Elinor about his engagement to Lucy but chose not to, appearing rather selfish.
The film changes this by having Edward arrive later and giving him a more charming and awkward demeanor, much like Hugh Grant’s portrayal. This shift was crucial for the movie since it kept Edward from being seen in a negative light. The movie emphasizes his inner conflict between his feelings for Elinor and his sense of duty and honor towards his fiancée.
3. Willoughby’s Redemption
One of the most surprising differences is in the character arc of John Willoughby. Initially seen as a romantic hero, he later abandons Marianne for a wealthier match and leaves a scandal involving Col. Brandon’s ward. By the end of the book, most readers despise him, though he remains a compelling character.
However, the novel reveals that the harsh letter rejecting Marianne, supposedly sent by Willoughby, was actually written by his fiancée. This revelation redeems him somewhat, showing he did have genuine feelings for Marianne. He even visits her when she falls ill, indicating his concern. Despite his flaws, this scene where he watches Marianne’s wedding from a distance adds a layer of regret and longing to his character, making him more complex.
Final Thoughts
Both the novel and the film offer unique takes on the story, and each brings out different nuances. Personally, I found the film more engaging, as it highlighted some small details, like Margaret being a tomboy and Marianne’s love for Sonnet 116. “Sense and Sensibility” remains one of Jane Austen’s most cherished works, and this comparison of the book and film only deepens our appreciation of its timeless charm.
What differences did you notice between the book and the movie? Do you have a preference, or do you enjoy both equally? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
